Member Vetting Process
Log In
About
Members
News
Awards
Contact
Member Vetting Process
Log In
Log In
Member Search
Specialism
Law Firm
Advisory Firm
Country
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belgium
Belize
Bermuda
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Bulgaria
Cameroon
Canada
Cayman Islands
Chile
China
Colombia
Congo (Dem. Rep.)
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominican Republic
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Guatemala
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Kenya
Korea (South)
Kosovo
Kuwait
Lebanon
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malaysia
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Monaco
Morocco
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Republic of Ireland
Romania
Russia
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turks and Caicos Islands
UAE
Uganda
UK
Ukraine
Uruguay
USA
Vietnam
Zimbabwe
Practice Area
Abuse of Dominance
Accountancy
Accounting and Tax
Acquisition Finance
Administrative
Admiralty
Agribusiness
AI
Alternative Asset Management
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Alternative Finance
Arbitration
Art
Asset Protection
Asset Protection Structures
Audit & Assurance
Audit & Finance
Audit and Accounting Services
Audit and Administration
Aviation
Banking & Finance
Banking Litigation
Bankruptcy
Broker Risk Management
Business
Business Formation
Business Immigration
Capital Markets
Citizenship
Citizenship by Descent
Civil
Civil Litigation
Civil Rights
Commercial
Commercial Arbitration
Commercial Contracts
Commercial Leasing
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Property
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Tenancy
Commodities Trading
Commodity Disputes
Company
Company & Fund Administration
Company Formation
Competition
Compliance
Compliance & Regulatory
Construction
Contentious Probate
Contract
Contractual Disputes
Copyright
Corporate
Corporate Accountant & VAT
Corporate Criminal
Corporate Finance
Corporate Governance
Corporate Immigration
Corporate Investment
Corporate Restructuring
Corporate Risk Management
Corporate Services
Corporate Support Services
Corporate Tax
Costs
Criminal
Criminal Defence
Criminal Fraud
Cross Border Estates
Cross-Border
Cross-Border Transactions
Cultural Property
Customs Advisory
Data & Innovation
Data Privacy
Data Protection
Debt Collection
Debt Recovery
Defence & Security Procurement
Digital Transformation Consultancy
Dispute Resolution
Divorce
Domestic & International Tax
Due Diligence
Economic Criminal
Employee Benefits
Employment
Employment Litigation
Energy
Energy & Natural Resources
Environmental
ERISA & Employment Benefits
Estate Planning
European
Expert Witness Property Valuation
Family
Fiduciary
Financial Services
Financial Services & Regulatory
Financial Transactions
FinTech
Fiscal
Foreign Direct Investments
Foreign Investments
Franchise
Fraud
Full Service
Fund Administration
Gaming
Health & Safety
Healthcare
Healthcare M&A
Hedge Funds
Human Rights & Labour Rights
Immigration
India Desk
Industrial Relations
Information Technology
Infrastructure
Inheritance
Insolvency
Insurance
Insurance & Reinsurance
Insurance Litigation
Intellectual Property
International Arbitration
International Business
International Corporate
International Debt Collection
International Dispute Resolution
International Employment
International Franchise
International Fraud
International Litigation
International Private
International Real Estate
International Succession
International Tax
International Tax Planning
International Trade
International Trade & National Security
Investigations
Investment
IP Litigation
IT
IT Services
Joint Ventures
Labour & Employment
Leasehold Enfranchisement
Legal Malpractice
Legal Risk Management
Life Science Patent
Life Sciences
Litigation
Litigation & Arbitration
M&A
Maritime
Maritime Arbitration
Matrimonial
Media & Entertainment
Mediation
Mediation & Arbitration
Medical Malpractice
Mining
Neuroradiology Expert Witness
New Technologies
Oil & Gas
Orthopaedic Expert Witness
Patent Litigation
Patent Prosecution
Patents
Payroll Accounting
Personal Injury
Personal Injury - Plaintiff
Pharmaceutical Sector Patents
Pharmaceuticals & Life Sciences
Private Client
Private Equity
Private Funds
Probate & Inheritance
Products
Project
Project Finance
Property Valuation
Public Procurement
Real Estate
Real Estate - Property
Regulatory
Regulatory & Compliance
Renewable Energy
Restructuring
SaaS/PaaS
Securities
Securities Litigation
Shipping & Admiralty
Shipping & Maritime
Shipping Finance
Sports
Start Up
Succession
Tax
Tax Litigation
Tax Planning
Tax Relocation
Tax Services
Tax Structures
Technology
Telecommunications
TMT
Trademark
Transaction
Transfer Pricing
Transportation
Trust & Estates
Trust Administration
Venture Capital
Wealth & Estate Planning
Wealth Management
Wealth Planning
Whistleblower
White Collar Crime
Wills, Trusts & Estate Planning
Workers Compensation
Workplace Law & Investigations
The Effect of Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 on International Commercial Arbitration
Published: Monday, July 4, 2016
Introduction
International Arbitration has emerged as most preferred choice for determining the cross border commercial disputes. With a steady increase in international trade and investment involving India, there has been a corresponding rise in cross border commercial disputes too. The Indian judiciary has given certain controversial decisions in last decade and has drawn criticism for interfering in international arbitrations and extra territorial application of domestic laws to foreign seated arbitrations and particularly in cases involving a foreign party, which has drawn tremendous focus from the international community on India’s international arbitration regime and the international community has kept a close watch on the development of arbitration laws in India. During the period of 2012 to 2015, various landmark rulings were delivered by the Supreme Court while taking a much needed pro-arbitration approach such as removing the Indian judiciary’s power to interfere with arbitrations seated outside India and declaring the Indian arbitration law to be seat-centric; referring non-signatories to an arbitration agreement to settle disputes through arbitration; defining the scope of public policy in foreign-seated arbitration; and determining that even fraud is arbitrable. These decisions clearly reflect the support of the judiciary towards arbitration proceedings which has enabled India to adopt international best practices.
In order to inspire the confidence of Foreign Investors to invest in India, to support the government’s ambitious initiative of ‘ease of doing business in India’ and to bolster international investors in the trustworthiness of the Indian legal system to provide an expeditious, cheaper and flexible dispute resolution mechanism, the President of India promulgated the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 (“Ordinance”) on October 23, 2015. The Ordinance has been largely based on the recommendations made by the 246th Law Commission Report and the major rulings passed in the last two decades while clarifying the major controversies which arose due to certain disputed decisions by Indian judiciary. The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2015 (“Bill”) was passed with minor additions to the amendments introduced by the Ordinance on December 17, 2015 by the Lok Sabha and on December 23, 2015 by Rajya Sabha respectively. On December 31, 2015, the President of India signed the Bill and the same was notified vide gazette notification dated January 1, 2016.
The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015
(“Amendment Act”) which amends the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
, came into effect retrospectively i.e. from October 23, 2015 meaning thereby that the said Amendment Act is applicable to all the arbitral proceedings commenced after October 23, 2015 (Section 26 of the Amendment Act, 2015).
Background to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Before the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the “Act”), the law governing arbitration in India consisted mainly of three statutes:
i. The Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 (“1937 Act”)
ii. The Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 (“1940 Act”) and
iii. The Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 (“1961 Act”)
The 1940 Act was the general law governing arbitration in India which had become outdated. For the purpose of reforming and amending the law relating to domestic arbitration, international commercial arbitration and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and also to define the law relating to conciliation and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 –was amended and to address these concerns with a primary purpose to encourage arbitration as a cost-effective and time-efficient mechanism for the settlement of commercial disputes in the national and international sphere, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act') came into place. The Act was also brought in to provide a speedy and efficacious dispute resolution mechanism. This Act is based on the UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, as adopted in 1985 by the United Nations and applies to both international as well as to domestic arbitration.
Scheme and Objective of the Act
The objective of the Act is to provide a speedy and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism which would give parties finality in their disputes. The Act is dived into three parts. Part I of the Act deals with Arbitration that is conducted in India and its enforcement. Part II provides for arbitration conducted in a Foreign Country and enforcement of such foreign awards. Part III of the Act is a statutory embodiment of conciliation provisions and Part IV of the 1996 Act deals with supplementary provisions.
1.
Part I deals with domestic arbitration and ICA, when seated in India. An arbitration seated in India between one foreign party and an Indian party, though defined as ICA is treated akin to a domestic arbitration.
2.
Part II deals with foreign award with regard to its enforcement as per the Convention on “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award”, 1958 (“New York Convention”) and Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1927 (“Geneva Convention”). This part regulates arbitration only in respect to the commencement and recognition/ enforcement of a foreign award which is delivered in an arbitration seated out¬side India and no provisions under the same can be derogated by a contract between two parties.
3.
Part III of the Act is a statutory embodiment of conciliation provisions.
4.
Part IV of the 1996 Act deals with supplementary provisions.
Foreign investors and corporates doing business in India were just not ready to risk the Indian legal system. In 1996, the preferred seat in any cross-border contract was always a heavily negotiated point which was clearly reflected from the number of decisions from the courts and, more often than not, ended up being Singapore, New York, or London.
Arbitration and Conciliation Amendment Act, 2015
While keeping in mind the objectives of the Act, significant changes have been made to the Act by way of amendments through the Amendment Act as an attempt to make India a hub of International commercial arbitration. Strict timelines have been brought about in the Amendment Act with the scope for resolving disputes by a fast track mechanism and for completion of the arbitral proceedings pending before the Courts. Certain amendments to the existing provisions with regard to the process of appointment of an arbitrator have been inserted and the grounds of challenge of an arbitrator due to lack of independence and impartiality have been clarified.
As a welcome move, foreign-seated arbitrations can get interim relief from Indian courts before the commencement of the arbitration and the challenge petitions do not operate as an automatic stay on the execution process. The recent amendments are categorized into three (3) stages which outlines the main intention of the Amendment Act. Below are the snapshots to the major amendments introduced by the Amendment Act:
A. Pre-arbitral proceedings
i. Independence and impartiality
1.
In order to correspond with international standards, the extensive guidelines in relation to the independence, impartiality, and fees of arbitrators have been introduced in Section 12 of the Amendment Act and the schedules for the same.
2.
In case of international commercial arbitrations the appointment of arbitrators to be done by Supreme Court and in case of domestic arbitrations respective High Courts have to appoint the arbitrators purely in an administrative capacity respectively.
3.
Expeditious disposal of the Applications for appointment of an arbitrator while making an effort to dispose off the same within a period of (60) sixty days from date of service of notice on the opposite party.
4.
Detailed schedule has been included to set out the guidelines to make an arbitrator ineligible.
ii. Interim reliefs
1.
Under Section 9 of the Amendment Act, in case of international commercial arbitrations seated in India applications can be made directly before High Court and the same is applicable in case of the foreign seated arbitrations.
2.
In case of the foreign-seated arbitrations, the parties have been granted flexibility to approach Indian courts to seek interim relief.
3.
Interim reliefs granted by arbitral tribunals seated in India are enforceable now and are deemed to be orders of the Court.
4.
Arbitration proceedings must commence within 90 days or any further time as determined by the court after the grant of interim relief. In case the arbitral tribunal has been constituted the Court shall not entertain the interim application, unless circumstances exist which Court may consider appropriate.
B. Arbitral proceedings
i. Expeditious disposal
1.
For completion of arbitration seated in India a time line of twelve-months has been prescribed under Section 8 of the Amendment Act.
2.
Indicative timelines for filing arbitration applications before courts have been incorporated for the expeditious disposal of applications in relation to interim reliefs, appointment of arbitrator, and challenge petitions;
3.
So as to resolve certain disputes within a period of six months expedited/fast track arbitration procedure has been put in place.
ii. Costs
1.
In relation to determination of costs including fees and expenses by arbitral tribunals seated in India, a detailed new provision Section 31A in the “Act” has been inserted vide Section 17 of the Amendment Act
2.
‘Costs follow the event’ regime has been inserted to bring it in line with inter¬national standards.
C. Post-arbitral proceedings
i. Challenge and enforcement
1.
In case arbitration is seated in India, the grounds on which an arbitral award can be challenged have been narrowed.
2.
Under Section 34, the petitions can be filed directly before High Court in case where the international commercial arbitrations seated in India.
3.
Once the notice is served on the opposite party, the petition has to be disposed off within one (1) year.
4.
The execution of award shall not be stayed automatically in case where the award is challenged. The court has to pass a specific order to stay any such execution of the award.
Conclusion
Commercial players in India and abroad have developed a strong preference to resolve disputes via arbitration which has led to the need of stable dispute resolution process which also caters to the need for boosting the economy by attracting foreign investment. There has been positive change in the approach of the Indian judiciary to bring arbitration law in line with the international practice. With the Amendment Act in place and the positive approach of the courts, the applicability and interpretation of the Amendment Act in cases involving international commercial dispute is yet to be seen in the light of Indian perspective.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Member Introduction
Ramon Carrion
Ramon Carrion - U.S. Immigration and Nationality law
Florida, USA
View Profile
Daren Lipinsky
Brown & Lipinsky LLP
California, USA
View Profile
Carlos E. López López
Wolf Popper LLP.
New York, USA
View Profile
Daniel Boehnen
McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
Illinois, USA
View Profile
The Lawyer Network in numbers
0
+
Members Firms
0
+
Countries
0
+
Practice Areas
0
+
Member Firms
Total Staff