Member Search

Civil Fraud: Common Categories Explained

Published: Monday, November 4, 2024

The UK legal system differentiates between two main types of fraud: civil fraud and criminal fraud. Both forms of fraud may involve deceit, misrepresentation, or intentional concealment of the truth to gain a dishonest advantage over another party. They also differ significantly in several respects, including who initiates the legal action, the burden of proof required, and the potential penalties that can be imposed on the defendant amongst others.

When trying to differentiate whether your situation falls under civil fraud and criminal fraud, remember, civil fraud is pursued by the victim in civil courts, while criminal fraud is a criminal offence prosecuted by UK authorities in criminal courts.

In criminal fraud, the person alleged to be responsible is normally prosecuted by the State and, if found guilty, will be punished, according to the severity of the offence, by penalties such as a fine or imprisonment. 

In cases of civil fraud, the wronged party may pursue the recovery of funds or assets and/or seek compensation or damages. The outcome in a civil trial is determined by a judge.

In this article, we highlight common types of civil fraud claims that are pursued in court and the remedies available to those who have suffered financial harm due to fraudulent misrepresentation or deceit. Understanding these nuances can help individuals and businesses better protect their interests and navigate complex legal disputes.


Civil Fraud 

Frauds derived from common law, generally known as torts, rely heavily on ‘case law’ established from previously decided litigation and which provides guidance for the conduct of subsequent court proceedings.

Claims are pursued by the injured party through the appropriate Civil Court according to the nature, size and importance of the loss claimed to have occurred.

It is important for both individuals and businesses, regardless of their size or structure, to appreciate the general nature of fraud. This knowledge helps prevent accidental involvement in fraudulent activities and recognise the signs that they are, or may potentially become, victims of both civil and criminal fraud.

Anyone who has been a victim of fraud can report the matter to the police, which may lead to a criminal prosecution. In addition it is open for the aggrieved party to pursue the appropriate remedy through a Civil Court. Both criminal and civil cases for the same fraud may be conducted simultaneously, although very careful consideration will be required to determine exactly how and when to proceed.


Fraud by False Representation 

An action for misrepresentation may be brought in respect of a misrepresentation of fact or law. This arises where one party makes an untrue statement of fact or law which induces the other party to enter into a contract, resulting in loss to that party.

There are three types of misrepresentation:

  • Fraudulent misrepresentation: where a false representation has been made knowingly, or without reasonable belief in its truth or recklessly as to its truth, (also known as the tort of deceit).
  • Negligent misrepresentation: one which is made carelessly in breach of duty to take reasonable care owed by the one party to the other that the representation is accurate. 
  • Innocent misrepresentation: is one made which is neither fraudulent nor negligent.


The general remedies, subject to various limitations, available before a Civil Court are:

  • rescission of the contract, i.e. cancelling or unwinding the contract, placing the parties in the position they were in before entering the contract, and/or
  • a sum in respect of damages.


Unlawful Means Conspiracy 

In order to establish such a conspiracy five elements must be shown:

  • Two or more persons agree, or in some way informally combine, to injure another person. It is possible for a director of a company to conspire with that company against another.
  • The conspirators must carry out a deliberate act. 
  • The deliberate act involves unlawful means such as the commission of another tort, a breach of contract, etc.
  • One of the purposes of the conspiracy must be to cause injury to the victim.

  • Damage must be suffered by the victim.


Bribery 

A bribe describes any advantage offered to a person with the intent of persuading them to perform a specific action, typically for financial or personal gain of the person offering the bribe.

A bribe of this nature might occur, for instance, when a payment is made during a commercial transaction to an individual acting in the position of an agent, in order to influence the terms of a contract without the knowledge of his/ her Principal, who is a party to the contract. 

In other words, it is a ‘secret payment’ designed to influence an outcome without the knowledge of other interested parties.

A Claimant seeking damages arising from such activity does not have to prove the dishonest nature of the bribe as this will be presumed. However, if the payment is regarded as being too small and insignificant to cause any worthwhile conflict of interest, it will probably not be regarded as being sufficient to represent any significant influence.

Generally, a Court will have to consider whether there is a ‘real possibility’ that the bribe amounted to a detrimental conflict of interest which occasioned the alleged resultant damage. 


Dishonest Assistance

Dishonest assistance arises when a person assists or facilitates a dishonest or fraudulent act of a wrongdoer.

There must be a breach of trust or fiduciary duty by another involving a dishonest act or omission. Such dishonesty may be actual dishonesty or ‘blind eye’ dishonesty, where a person suspects a dishonest act but deliberately avoids ascertaining the true position.


Breach of Fiduciary Duty

A fiduciary is a person who has assumed a position involving a high level of trust thereby creating a relationship of trust and confidence. 

Fiduciary duties include: 

  • acting in good faith,
  • avoiding conflicts of interest,
  • not profiting from the privileged trusted position.

Common instances where a fiduciary duty may be created include instructing someone to conduct a sale of property, a business, manage a portfolio of shares or negotiate a confidential contract.

A fiduciary who has profited from their breach will be liable to account for the profits that they have made, regardless of whether the profits would have been made had they not breached their fiduciary duty. 


How Can We Assist?

If you are facing allegations of civil fraud or criminal fraud, the consequences can be severe, impacting reputation, finances and potentially your freedom. At KANGS, we understand the complexities of fraud cases and the potential consequences involved. 

The team at KANGS brings a wealth of experience gained from supporting clients through a wide range of civil and criminal fraud cases, covering virtually every conceivable nature of fraudulent activity. Contact us using the details below for a confidential consultation with our skilled solicitors:

Tel:       0333 370 4333

Email: info@kangssolicitors.co.uk

We provide initial no obligation discussion at our three offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester. Alternatively, discussions can be held through live conferencing or telephone.

Hamraj Kang
Kangs Solicitors
Country:
England, UK
Practice Area:
Fraud
Phone Number:
020 7936 6396
Fax:
N/A
Hamraj acts for corporate and individual clients in investigations brought by the major UK law enforcement agencies including the SFO, HMRC, FCA, NCA, CMA, CPS, BEIS, ICO, Trading Standards and a wide range of regulatory bodies. He has particular expertise in HMRC investigations and prosecutions including MTIC & VAT fraud, money laundering, tax & duty evasion and regularly conducts cases throughout the country. There are few solicitors nationally who can match Hamraj’s experience of complex multi-million pounds MTIC and VAT fraud cases as he acted in many such cases in his career. He has considerable expertise in the areas of money laundering, bribery & corruption and insider dealing, having been instructed by a number of PLCs and senior company executives on such matters. The work is often complex, multi-jurisdictional and necessitates overseas travel which has led to Hamraj working in numerous overseas jurisdictions. Hamraj advises corporate and individual clients both during and in the immediate aftermath of a dawn raid when quick, effective and incisive advice is required to protect the legal rights and reputation of the client. He has considerable experience of representing clients in interviews with all the leading law enforcement agencies including the SFO, HMRC and the NCA. He is admired for his novel tactical thinking and possesses a proven track record of guiding clients to a successful conclusion in many difficult and demanding cases. As a result of working on high profile and complex fraud cases, Hamraj’s client base is both national and international ranging from publicly listed companies to individual clients. Due to his expertise and experience in international financial crime investigations, Hamraj is also instructed in complex extradition cases often with a financial crime background involving allegations such as money laundering, wire fraud, bribery and corruption. He accepts instructions involving all jurisdictions but most notably the USA, Russia, CIS countries, India, Pakistan, Africa, the Caribbean, South America and the Far East. Civil Fraud & Asset Recovery In addition to criminal fraud, Hamraj advises in relation to civil fraud matters acting for both claimants and defendants. His clients range from large corporations to private individuals with the work often including early action and interim reliefs.  The areas of work include: Cryptocurrency disputes The conduct of internal investigations on behalf of corporate clients Obtaining and responding to freezing orders Obtaining and responding to search orders Norwich Pharmacal orders Receivership orders The civil fraud and asset recovery High Court litigation for claimants and defendants includes allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary and directors’ duties, unjust enrichment, unlawful means conspiracy, bribery, deceit, carousel/MTIC fraud, boiler room fraud and bogus investment schemes. Civil Recovery | POCA Hamraj is recognised by Chambers UK as a leading lawyer in the area of proceeds of crime and asset forfeiture, being one of only six solicitors ranked in Band 1 in the country. His work includes civil recovery proceedings under Part 5 of POCA such as Property Freezing Orders, Civil Recovery Orders and Account Freezing Orders. Hamraj is also able to advise in relation to Interim Freezing Orders and Unexplained Wealth Orders. HMRC Tax Investigations | Tax Tribunals There is often a considerable overlap between criminal and civil fraud proceedings and HMRC civil tax investigations. Hamraj regularly advises both corporate and individual clients in relation to HMRC civil tax investigations, VAT Assessments including Kittel Assessments as well as COP8 & COP9 investigations. The work includes representation before the First-tier Tax Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal in relation to VAT Assessments, Kittel VAT Notices, Direct Tax Appeals, Personal Liability Notices, Condemnation Proceedings and Excise Duty matters. Disciplinary | Regulatory | Sports Work Hamraj has represented a number of professionals facing criminal and regulatory allegations including accountants and other financial professionals, solicitors, doctors, dentists and pharmacists. He has developed an excellent understanding of the regulatory framework and codes of professional conduct governing the professions. In recent years, Hamraj has successfully represented a number of solicitors in serious criminal fraud prosecutions and achieved their acquittal which has resulted in a successful outcome in associated SRA disciplinary proceedings. Hamraj has represented many individuals from the sporting world (mainly football, cricket, horse racing and boxing) and is regularly instructed by a number of Premier League and Championship Football Clubs. Serious Criminal Work Hamraj also undertakes serious criminal work such as historic sexual allegations, murder, corporate manslaughter, drugs offences and serious driving offences, having acted in many high-profile cases of this nature. Clients include football clubs, members of the professions, company executives and public figures from the world of entertainment, politics, media and sport. Hamraj places the issues of confidentiality, privacy and reputation management at the forefront of his strategy when conducting cases. Matters are dealt with the utmost sensitivity and complete discretion. He always adopts a strong and proactive approach to investigations with the overriding objective to bring each matter to a successful and swift conclusion, and where possible, to avoid court proceedings and any adverse publicity for his client.

Member Introduction

The Lawyer Network in numbers

0+

Members Firms

0+

Countries

0+

Practice Areas

0+

Member Firms
Total Staff